Skip to main content

 The Misinformation on DNA and Sexual Partners


 Waves of misinformation have gained traction, suggesting that women retain DNA from every man they have had sexual intercourse with. This claim has sparked widespread concern, particularly among women, with alarming assertions that sexual activity can fundamentally alter a woman's biological makeup in irreversible and harmful ways. However, a closer examination of the science behind these claims reveals that they are not only inaccurate but also misleading.


Understanding DNA and Microchimerism


To address these concerns, it is essential to start with a basic understanding of DNA. Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is the molecule that carries the genetic instructions necessary for the development, functioning, and reproduction of all living organisms. Structurally, DNA is composed of two strands that wind around each other to form a double helix. These strands are made up of a backbone consisting of sugars and phosphate groups, with nitrogenous bases—adenine (A), cytosine (C), guanine (G), and thymine (T)—attached to them. The sequence of these bases encodes the genetic information that dictates biological processes.


The misconception in question involves the concept of microchimerism, which refers to the presence of a small number of cells in one individual that originated from another individual. While microchimerism is a real phenomenon, it primarily occurs in cases such as pregnancy, where fetal cells can cross the placental barrier and remain in the mother's body for decades. It is important to note that microchimerism does not support the idea that DNA from sexual partners becomes a permanent part of a woman's body.


The confusion surrounding this issue may stem from a 2012 study led by Dr. J. Lee Nelson at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center. The study found that a significant percentage of women had small amounts of male DNA in their brains. The most likely source of this DNA was pregnancy, specifically with a male fetus, as the researchers detected Y chromosomes, which are exclusive to males. The study did not, however, conclude that this male DNA was a result of sexual activity.


Furthermore, the presence of male DNA in women who have never had sons is not an indication of sexual transmission. It is believed that these DNA traces may originate from other sources, such as a twin brother or an older brother, or even from a vanished male twin during early pregnancy stages. The notion that sperm or male DNA from sexual partners could integrate into a woman’s body and cause long-term biological changes is not supported by any credible scientific evidence. Sperm cells, once introduced into the female reproductive tract, typically survive for only a few days and are incapable of integrating into a woman’s DNA.


The Consequences of Spreading Misinformation


The dissemination of this kind of misinformation is not just scientifically baseless; it is also harmful. It can instill unwarranted fear and guilt, particularly among women, by perpetuating the false belief that sexual activity can lead to permanent and detrimental changes in their biology. This narrative reinforces outdated and damaging stereotypes about female sexuality, suggesting that women should fear the consequences of their sexual choices in ways that are not grounded in any scientific reality.


Moreover, this misinformation distracts from legitimate health concerns associated with sexual activity, such as the risk of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and the importance of practicing safe sex. Instead of focusing on unverified and alarmist claims, it is crucial to educate individuals about scientifically supported health practices and the real risks associated with sexual behavior.


The Need for Accurate Information


In an era where information spreads rapidly and widely, it is more important than ever to ensure that the information we share is accurate and based on sound scientific evidence. Misinformation can easily take root and spread, particularly when it taps into societal fears or taboos. Therefore, the scientific community and responsible media outlets must debunk these myths and provide the public with reliable, evidence-based information.


The claim that women retain DNA from every man they have sex with, leading to long-term changes in their biological makeup, is not supported by scientific research. While the concept of microchimerism is legitimate, it is closely associated with pregnancy, not sexual activity. It is vital to approach such sensational claims with skepticism and to base our understanding of biology and health on well-established scientific facts rather than on unverified and misleading information.


Written by Daniel Okonkwo for Profile International Human Rights Advocate.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

 THE ILLEGAL AND HEALTH RISKS OF CONSUMING CROCODILE MEAT IN NIGERIA: I thought you should know Eating suya is considered the ultimate African street food, particularly popular in countries like Nigeria. However, in recent times, some individuals have strayed from the norm, venturing into consuming endangered animals—a dangerous practice that can have serious legal consequences. In Nigeria, the consumption of grilled crocodile meat—or crocodile meat in any form—can land you in jail. Yes, you heard that correctly. The Nigerian government has sued individuals for killing and consuming crocodiles, citing violations of environmental and wildlife protection laws. In cities like Abuja and Lagos, there are numerous joints where crocodile meat is openly sold, often without the knowledge of customers regarding the dangers and legal risks involved. If you are caught buying or eating such meat by government enforcement agents, you could face arrest and prosecution. Importantly, ignorance of t...
 ARE COWS MORE VALUABLE THAN HUMANS IN NIGERIA? WHAT IS THE VALUE OF LIFE IN A NATION IN CRISIS — HOW MANY MORE MUST DIE? By Daniel Okonkwo In recent years, the value of human life in Nigeria has come under intense scrutiny, particularly due to the relentless attacks on farming communities, primarily in the Middle Belt and North-Central regions. The haunting question that continues to echo across local and international discourse is: Are cows more valuable than human beings in Nigeria? This question becomes even more unsettling when viewed through the lens of recurring, unprovoked attacks by armed herdsmen—mostly identified as Fulani militants—on rural communities. Headlines consistently portray the devastating impact of these attacks: “At least 21 killed in Nigeria after herdsmen attack villagers,” “At least 140 villagers killed by suspected herders,” and “On April 12, 2022, armed herdsmen attacked several villages in Benue State, killing over 25 people and injuring many more.” Th...

Security Chiefs, Do Your Job—Nigerians Are Dying: The Herders-Farmers Conflict Rooted in Land, Law, and Neglect

 Security Chiefs, Do Your Job—Nigerians Are Dying: The Herders-Farmers Conflict Rooted in Land, Law, and Neglect By Daniel Okonkwo For close to three decades, a brutal and persistent conflict has gripped Nigeria’s Middle Belt, with the state of Benue emerging as one of its bloodiest epicenters. What began as tensions between itinerant herders and local farmers has evolved into an entrenched humanitarian and security crisis. Despite Nigeria’s constitutional guarantees and land governance framework, the conflict continues to claim lives, displace communities, and erode the nation’s socio-political cohesion.  Why can't herders—like every other Nigerian—buy land or peacefully negotiate for grazing rights with host communities? Instead, there have been recurring reports of herders trespassing on farmland, destroying crops, and engaging in deadly confrontations with local populations. This crisis intensified during the previous administration and has escalated dramatically in recent...