Skip to main content

 Tenant’s Perspective on Fairness and Responsibility


In recent years, tenement rates have become a contentious issue, igniting debate among landlords, tenants, and local government authorities. The crux of the discussion centers on who should be responsible for paying these rates—landlords who own the properties or tenants who occupy them. Although the legal framework provides some guidance, the practical implications often result in confusion and, in many cases, an unfair burden on tenants.


What Are Tenement Rates?


Tenement rates are taxes levied by local government authorities on developed and occupied properties within their jurisdiction. The revenue generated from these rates is intended to support infrastructural development and the provision of social amenities within communities. The amount payable is typically assessed annually based on the property's value, with many local governments in Nigeria applying a rate of 4 kobo for every ₦100 of the property's annual value.


Nigerian law clearly outlines the legal responsibility for paying tenement rates. According to the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, the authority to levy tenement rates lies with local government authorities, as prescribed by state legislation. However, the situation in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) is further complicated by conflicting judicial interpretations.


In the 2018 case of Planned Shelter Limited vs. Abuja Municipal Area Council (AMAC) & 5 Others, the High Court of the FCT ruled that the collection of tenement rates by Area Councils in the FCT was illegal, as the National Assembly had not enacted a law prescribing the rates. This decision effectively halted the collection of tenement rates in the FCT until such a law was passed. However, a prior ruling by the Court of Appeal in the 2014 case of Afdin Venture Limited vs. Chairman AMAC upheld the constitutionality of AMAC's authority to assess and collect tenement rates, creating a legal ambiguity that remains unresolved by a superior court.


 The Burden on Tenants


The responsibility for tenement rates should rest with landlords; many have shifted this burden onto their tenants. This practice is unfair. Tenants, who are already responsible for rent, service charges, and other obligatory payments, are often pressured into paying tenement rates that should rightly be the responsibility of the property owner.


This shift in responsibility can be attributed to various factors. Some landlords may be unwilling or unable to pay the tenement rates themselves, while others, living outside the jurisdiction of the taxing authority, may find it more convenient to pass the cost onto their tenants. Caretakers, acting on behalf of landlords, are also guilty of imposing these charges on tenants, further exacerbating the issue.


Tenants’ Rights and Legal Recourse


Tenants must be aware of their rights regarding tenement rates. By law, the responsibility for paying these rates should fall squarely on the property owner. Any attempt by a landlord to shift this burden onto tenants is unethical. Tenants who find themselves in this situation have the right to pause the payment and seek legal advice if necessary.


In cases where landlords are unreachable or reside outside the jurisdiction, local government authorities may serve demand notices to tenants as occupiers of the property. However, tenants are entitled to indemnity from the landlord for any payments made under such circumstances. Tenants must document all such interactions and seek legal redress if their rights are infringed upon.


The issue of tenement rates underlines a broader problem in the landlord-tenant relationship in Nigeria. Tenants are often unfairly burdened with costs that should be borne by landlords, leading to financial strain and, in some cases, legal disputes. It is imperative for landlords to fulfill their responsibilities and for local governments to enforce these obligations fairly.


Moreover, a definitive ruling from a superior court is needed to resolve the legal ambiguities surrounding tenement rates in the FCT and other regions. Until such clarity is achieved, tenants must remain vigilant, assert their rights, and refuse to be unfairly burdened by taxes that are not their responsibility.


In an era where the cost of living continues to rise, it is only fair that landlords shoulder their rightful responsibilities, allowing tenants to live without the undue stress of additional financial burdens. Resolving this issue requires both legal clarity and a commitment to fairness from all parties involved.


Written by Daniel Okonkwo for Profile International Human Rights Advocate.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

 THE ILLEGAL AND HEALTH RISKS OF CONSUMING CROCODILE MEAT IN NIGERIA: I thought you should know Eating suya is considered the ultimate African street food, particularly popular in countries like Nigeria. However, in recent times, some individuals have strayed from the norm, venturing into consuming endangered animals—a dangerous practice that can have serious legal consequences. In Nigeria, the consumption of grilled crocodile meat—or crocodile meat in any form—can land you in jail. Yes, you heard that correctly. The Nigerian government has sued individuals for killing and consuming crocodiles, citing violations of environmental and wildlife protection laws. In cities like Abuja and Lagos, there are numerous joints where crocodile meat is openly sold, often without the knowledge of customers regarding the dangers and legal risks involved. If you are caught buying or eating such meat by government enforcement agents, you could face arrest and prosecution. Importantly, ignorance of t...
 ARE COWS MORE VALUABLE THAN HUMANS IN NIGERIA? WHAT IS THE VALUE OF LIFE IN A NATION IN CRISIS — HOW MANY MORE MUST DIE? By Daniel Okonkwo In recent years, the value of human life in Nigeria has come under intense scrutiny, particularly due to the relentless attacks on farming communities, primarily in the Middle Belt and North-Central regions. The haunting question that continues to echo across local and international discourse is: Are cows more valuable than human beings in Nigeria? This question becomes even more unsettling when viewed through the lens of recurring, unprovoked attacks by armed herdsmen—mostly identified as Fulani militants—on rural communities. Headlines consistently portray the devastating impact of these attacks: “At least 21 killed in Nigeria after herdsmen attack villagers,” “At least 140 villagers killed by suspected herders,” and “On April 12, 2022, armed herdsmen attacked several villages in Benue State, killing over 25 people and injuring many more.” Th...

Security Chiefs, Do Your Job—Nigerians Are Dying: The Herders-Farmers Conflict Rooted in Land, Law, and Neglect

 Security Chiefs, Do Your Job—Nigerians Are Dying: The Herders-Farmers Conflict Rooted in Land, Law, and Neglect By Daniel Okonkwo For close to three decades, a brutal and persistent conflict has gripped Nigeria’s Middle Belt, with the state of Benue emerging as one of its bloodiest epicenters. What began as tensions between itinerant herders and local farmers has evolved into an entrenched humanitarian and security crisis. Despite Nigeria’s constitutional guarantees and land governance framework, the conflict continues to claim lives, displace communities, and erode the nation’s socio-political cohesion.  Why can't herders—like every other Nigerian—buy land or peacefully negotiate for grazing rights with host communities? Instead, there have been recurring reports of herders trespassing on farmland, destroying crops, and engaging in deadly confrontations with local populations. This crisis intensified during the previous administration and has escalated dramatically in recent...