Skip to main content

 Recent actions by the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Administration, under the leadership of Minister Nyesom Wike, have sparked significant debate surrounding the revocation of land titles and demolition of properties in Abuja. These actions, while rooted in statutory authority, have drawn allegations of corruption, injustice, and abuse of power, bringing the legal and procedural integrity of the process into question.


The power to revoke land titles derives from the Land Use Act of 1978. Specifically, Section 28(5)(a) and (b) grants governors and the FCT Minister the authority to revoke Certificates of Occupancy (C of O) on specified grounds, including:


1. Failure to develop the allocated land as stipulated in the terms of the grant.



2. Non-compliance with statutory conditions, such as the payment of ground rent or other obligations.


As the conservator of land within their jurisdiction, these authorities are mandated to ensure that decisions regarding revocation and reallocation adhere strictly to statutory provisions and principles of fairness. However, recent actions have raised concerns about potential deviations from these legal requirements.


These allegations by Vincent Martins Otse (“VeryDarkBlackMan”) In a widely circulated social media video, Vincent Martins Otse accused the FCT Minister of unlawfully revoking the land title of an estate in Life Camp, Abuja, belonging to the late Colonel Paul Ogbebor. Otse alleged:


The land, originally allocated in 1984, was revoked and subsequently reallocated to Saravera Nigeria Limited, a company allegedly linked to the minister’s business interests.


Shares in the reallocated property were purportedly distributed to Kingsley Chinda, Minority Leader of the House of Representatives.


VeryDarkBlackMan said that Colonel Ogbebor was the first cadet of the Nigerian Defence Academy (NDA Code 001) and a veteran of the civil war and was unjustly deprived of his estate.


Otse called upon senior military officers to intervene and uphold the legacy of Colonel Ogbebor, whose contributions to national unity remain significant.


A Temporary Right of Occupancy was granted in 1984, under which the company constructed permanent structures without obtaining statutory approvals for decades.


In November 2020, Paulosa applied for a Statutory Right of Occupancy, conditionally approved in February 2023, requiring payments totaling N57.1 million for ground rent, premiums, and arrears.


The company failed to fulfill these conditions for over 20 months, leading to the revocation of its title in October 2024.


Critics argue that the demolition notice was abrupt and unfair, with the company allegedly fulfilling earlier financial obligations demanded by the Federal Capital Development Authority (FCDA).


The Senior Special Assistant to the FCT Minister has defended the administration’s actions, stating:


The revocation of Paulosa’s title was predicated on long-standing non-compliance with statutory requirements.


The reallocation process followed due to legal procedures, and critics are urged to verify their claims before disseminating potentially misleading information.


The controversy raises critical questions regarding governance and adherence to legal frameworks:


1. Due Process: Was the revocation of Colonel Ogbebor’s estate and other properties conducted in strict compliance with the provisions of the Land Use Act?



2. Transparency: Are allegations of favoritism and abuse of power substantiated by credible evidence?



3. Property Rights: How does the FCT Administration ensure the protection of legitimate property rights while addressing non-compliance and illegalities?


While the Land Use Act empowers the FCT Minister to revoke land titles and demolish illegal structures, such powers must be exercised transparently and equitably. The FCT Administration is urged to:


Provide clear justifications for its decisions to ensure public confidence in its actions. Prioritizing transparency, fairness, and accountability, the FCT Administration can address these controversies while safeguarding the integrity of land administration in the Federal Capital Territory.


 Written by Daniel Okonkwo for Profile International Human Rights Advocate.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

 THE ILLEGAL AND HEALTH RISKS OF CONSUMING CROCODILE MEAT IN NIGERIA: I thought you should know Eating suya is considered the ultimate African street food, particularly popular in countries like Nigeria. However, in recent times, some individuals have strayed from the norm, venturing into consuming endangered animals—a dangerous practice that can have serious legal consequences. In Nigeria, the consumption of grilled crocodile meat—or crocodile meat in any form—can land you in jail. Yes, you heard that correctly. The Nigerian government has sued individuals for killing and consuming crocodiles, citing violations of environmental and wildlife protection laws. In cities like Abuja and Lagos, there are numerous joints where crocodile meat is openly sold, often without the knowledge of customers regarding the dangers and legal risks involved. If you are caught buying or eating such meat by government enforcement agents, you could face arrest and prosecution. Importantly, ignorance of t...
 ARE COWS MORE VALUABLE THAN HUMANS IN NIGERIA? WHAT IS THE VALUE OF LIFE IN A NATION IN CRISIS — HOW MANY MORE MUST DIE? By Daniel Okonkwo In recent years, the value of human life in Nigeria has come under intense scrutiny, particularly due to the relentless attacks on farming communities, primarily in the Middle Belt and North-Central regions. The haunting question that continues to echo across local and international discourse is: Are cows more valuable than human beings in Nigeria? This question becomes even more unsettling when viewed through the lens of recurring, unprovoked attacks by armed herdsmen—mostly identified as Fulani militants—on rural communities. Headlines consistently portray the devastating impact of these attacks: “At least 21 killed in Nigeria after herdsmen attack villagers,” “At least 140 villagers killed by suspected herders,” and “On April 12, 2022, armed herdsmen attacked several villages in Benue State, killing over 25 people and injuring many more.” Th...

Security Chiefs, Do Your Job—Nigerians Are Dying: The Herders-Farmers Conflict Rooted in Land, Law, and Neglect

 Security Chiefs, Do Your Job—Nigerians Are Dying: The Herders-Farmers Conflict Rooted in Land, Law, and Neglect By Daniel Okonkwo For close to three decades, a brutal and persistent conflict has gripped Nigeria’s Middle Belt, with the state of Benue emerging as one of its bloodiest epicenters. What began as tensions between itinerant herders and local farmers has evolved into an entrenched humanitarian and security crisis. Despite Nigeria’s constitutional guarantees and land governance framework, the conflict continues to claim lives, displace communities, and erode the nation’s socio-political cohesion.  Why can't herders—like every other Nigerian—buy land or peacefully negotiate for grazing rights with host communities? Instead, there have been recurring reports of herders trespassing on farmland, destroying crops, and engaging in deadly confrontations with local populations. This crisis intensified during the previous administration and has escalated dramatically in recent...