Skip to main content

 The likes of Dele Farotimi is visible 

In every thriving democracy, the principle of justice is a cornerstone that upholds the rights and freedoms of its citizens. It is in this spirit that we must examine the ongoing detention of Human Rights Lawyer Dele Farotimi, a situation that has raised profound concerns about the state of our democratic values and judicial processes.


Dele Farotimi, a relentless advocate for human rights, remains incarcerated despite being granted bail by both the Court. His continued detention is not only a legal anomaly but a moral affront to the principles of fairness and due process. How can we, as a society, reconcile this with the ideals of democracy that we strive to uphold?


Democracy thrives on the pillars of freedom, fairness, and accountability. It empowers citizens to speak the truth without fear of reprisal and assures them that their fundamental rights will be protected. Yet, when individuals like Dele Farotimi are denied their freedoms despite judicial rulings, it raises critical questions about the state’s commitment to democratic values.


The state bears a sacred duty to protect its democracy, even when doing so offends those in positions of power or privilege. As my learned friend aptly put it, “It is part of the occupational hazard that comes with the job.” Amnesty International and other global watchdogs have consistently highlighted instances of rights violations in Nigeria. If these allegations are not addressed, they risk undermining the very foundation of our justice system.


Nigeria’s history is replete with examples of courageous human rights advocates who fought for the freedoms we enjoy today. During the military administration, many legal luminaries stood against tyranny, often at great personal risk. They understood that a society without justice is one teetering on the brink of chaos. Their sacrifices have paved the way for a judiciary that is expected to function independently and impartially.


Today, Farotimi’s plight echoes the struggles of this groundbreaker. It serves as a reminder that the fight for justice is an ongoing battle. While human rights defenders may sometimes push boundaries to make their voices heard, this is no justification for denying them their fundamental rights.


The case involving Dele Farotimi and elder statesman Chief Afe Babalola has sparked widespread debate. At its core, it is a reflection of deeper societal issues. It is a discourse that transcends individual grievances, touching on the moral, legal, and political complexities that define our nation’s quest for a just society.


The dispute between these two prominent figures has brought to light critical questions about the dispensation of justice and the broader implications for social equity in Nigeria. It compels us to confront uncomfortable truths about our legal system, our democracy, and our collective responsibility to build a fair society.


Freedom is the essence of humanity. It is the right to live without chains, without imprisonment, and without the fear of speaking truth to power. The continued incarceration of Dele Farotimi, despite bail being granted, undermines this principle. It denies him the ability to challenge the legality of his detention and sets a dangerous precedent for all Nigerians.


Freedom fighters do not die; their legacies live on. They inspire generations to demand accountability and fight for justice. The question, therefore, is not just about Dele Farotimi’s freedom but about the legacy we are creating for future generations.


History will not forgive those who undermine democracy and justice. As we reflect on this case, we must ask ourselves: What will our legacy be? Will we be remembered as defenders of justice and truth, or as silent witnesses to the erosion of our democratic values?


The judiciary must reaffirm its commitment to justice by ensuring that Dele Farotimi’s rights are upheld. His immediate release and the enforcement of his bail conditions are not just legal necessities but moral imperatives.


Let us stand united in the fight for justice, the defense of democracy, and the protection of fundamental human rights. For as long as we allow injustices like this to persist, we risk betraying the sacrifices of those who fought for the freedoms we hold dear. Freedom is non-negotiable. Justice must prevail.


Written by Daniel Okonkwo for Profile International Human Rights Advocate.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

 THE ILLEGAL AND HEALTH RISKS OF CONSUMING CROCODILE MEAT IN NIGERIA: I thought you should know Eating suya is considered the ultimate African street food, particularly popular in countries like Nigeria. However, in recent times, some individuals have strayed from the norm, venturing into consuming endangered animals—a dangerous practice that can have serious legal consequences. In Nigeria, the consumption of grilled crocodile meat—or crocodile meat in any form—can land you in jail. Yes, you heard that correctly. The Nigerian government has sued individuals for killing and consuming crocodiles, citing violations of environmental and wildlife protection laws. In cities like Abuja and Lagos, there are numerous joints where crocodile meat is openly sold, often without the knowledge of customers regarding the dangers and legal risks involved. If you are caught buying or eating such meat by government enforcement agents, you could face arrest and prosecution. Importantly, ignorance of t...
Post a Comment
Read more
 ARE COWS MORE VALUABLE THAN HUMANS IN NIGERIA? WHAT IS THE VALUE OF LIFE IN A NATION IN CRISIS — HOW MANY MORE MUST DIE? By Daniel Okonkwo In recent years, the value of human life in Nigeria has come under intense scrutiny, particularly due to the relentless attacks on farming communities, primarily in the Middle Belt and North-Central regions. The haunting question that continues to echo across local and international discourse is: Are cows more valuable than human beings in Nigeria? This question becomes even more unsettling when viewed through the lens of recurring, unprovoked attacks by armed herdsmen—mostly identified as Fulani militants—on rural communities. Headlines consistently portray the devastating impact of these attacks: “At least 21 killed in Nigeria after herdsmen attack villagers,” “At least 140 villagers killed by suspected herders,” and “On April 12, 2022, armed herdsmen attacked several villages in Benue State, killing over 25 people and injuring many more.” Th...
Post a Comment
Read more

Security Chiefs, Do Your Job—Nigerians Are Dying: The Herders-Farmers Conflict Rooted in Land, Law, and Neglect

 Security Chiefs, Do Your Job—Nigerians Are Dying: The Herders-Farmers Conflict Rooted in Land, Law, and Neglect By Daniel Okonkwo For close to three decades, a brutal and persistent conflict has gripped Nigeria’s Middle Belt, with the state of Benue emerging as one of its bloodiest epicenters. What began as tensions between itinerant herders and local farmers has evolved into an entrenched humanitarian and security crisis. Despite Nigeria’s constitutional guarantees and land governance framework, the conflict continues to claim lives, displace communities, and erode the nation’s socio-political cohesion.  Why can't herders—like every other Nigerian—buy land or peacefully negotiate for grazing rights with host communities? Instead, there have been recurring reports of herders trespassing on farmland, destroying crops, and engaging in deadly confrontations with local populations. This crisis intensified during the previous administration and has escalated dramatically in recent...
Post a Comment
Read more