Skip to main content

 In a recent unfolding of events, Omoyele Sowore the publisher of Sahara Reporters, has raised allegations of harassment and intimidation by members of the Nigerian Police Force. This incident, which has sparked widespread discussion across social media platforms, shows the critical concerns about the abuse of power, legal boundaries, and accountability in public service.


The controversy stems from a recorded encounter between Sowore and police officers near the Murtala Muhammed International Airport in Lagos. According to the video, the officers allegedly set up what Sowore described as an illegal roadblock, ostensibly for extortion purposes. During the exchange, Sowore was asked to park his vehicle. He declined, instead questioning the officers’ actions, stating, "We are not parking. You people should calm down." Another police officer approached him by the passenger side and said Park Sowore refused and demanded the presence of a commissioner, insisting, “Go and bring your oga.”


Amid the tension, one of the officers allowed Sowore to proceed. However, the exchange reportedly escalated with one officer allegedly responding with, “God punish you,” to which Sowore replied God punish you too. The incident, while non-violent, has raised significant legal and ethical questions about the conduct of law enforcement officers and the rights of citizens in such encounters.



As stated by Sahara Reporters, the Nigerian Police Force is accusing Sowore of multiple offenses.


The inclusion of such allegations raises critical questions about their origin and substantiation, particularly given the video evidence widely shared online. The footage shows the officers eventually permitting Sowore to proceed, with no apparent resistance or obstruction on his part beyond verbal assertions of his rights.


The concept of intimidation and harassment, often used interchangeably in legal contexts, centers on creating a hostile environment to achieve specific objectives. These actions can blur the lines of legality, raising concerns about the ethical conduct of public officers. In this case, the alleged “illegal roadblock” and the subsequent allegations against Sowore bring to light potential violations of due process and abuse of power.


From a legal standpoint, the accusations of resisting or obstructing public officers must be supported by clear evidence of physical or verbal actions aimed at hindering lawful duties. However, in this instance, the video suggests that Sowore merely exercised his right to question the officers’ actions, which is constitutionally protected under freedom of expression. Similarly, allegations of cyberstalking, which typically involve the use of digital platforms to harass or intimidate, appear misplaced given the context of the encounter.


Sowore alleged that the Inspector General of Police (IGP), Kayode Egbetokun, may hold a personal grudge against him due to his consistent reference to the IGP as “illegal” following the extension of his tenure beyond the statutory retirement age. These claims, if true, highlight the potential misuse of institutional power for personal vendettas, undermining public confidence in law enforcement.


It is also alleged that Egbetokun had informed senior officers of his intent to "deal" with Sowore, further fueling speculation about the motivations behind the current allegations. Such claims, if verified, would contravene the principles of impartiality and professionalism that are foundational to policing in a democratic society.


This incident calls for thorough transparency and investigation into the actions of both parties. Law enforcement officers must adhere to constitutional mandates and uphold the rights of citizens, even in contentious situations. Conversely, citizens must also engage law enforcement respectfully while exercising their rights.


The Nigeria police practices should be aligned with accountability, professionalism, and the ethical use of authority. Public confidence in law enforcement depends on its ability to operate within the bounds of legality and fairness, free from personal biases or undue influence.


Omoyele Sowore’s ordeal is a reminder of the delicate balance between authority and accountability in a democratic state. As the investigation unfolds, Nigerians and the international community will be watching closely, hoping for a resolution that upholds justice and transparency.


Written by Daniel Okonkwo for Profile International Human Rights Advocate.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

 THE ILLEGAL AND HEALTH RISKS OF CONSUMING CROCODILE MEAT IN NIGERIA: I thought you should know Eating suya is considered the ultimate African street food, particularly popular in countries like Nigeria. However, in recent times, some individuals have strayed from the norm, venturing into consuming endangered animals—a dangerous practice that can have serious legal consequences. In Nigeria, the consumption of grilled crocodile meat—or crocodile meat in any form—can land you in jail. Yes, you heard that correctly. The Nigerian government has sued individuals for killing and consuming crocodiles, citing violations of environmental and wildlife protection laws. In cities like Abuja and Lagos, there are numerous joints where crocodile meat is openly sold, often without the knowledge of customers regarding the dangers and legal risks involved. If you are caught buying or eating such meat by government enforcement agents, you could face arrest and prosecution. Importantly, ignorance of t...
 ARE COWS MORE VALUABLE THAN HUMANS IN NIGERIA? WHAT IS THE VALUE OF LIFE IN A NATION IN CRISIS — HOW MANY MORE MUST DIE? By Daniel Okonkwo In recent years, the value of human life in Nigeria has come under intense scrutiny, particularly due to the relentless attacks on farming communities, primarily in the Middle Belt and North-Central regions. The haunting question that continues to echo across local and international discourse is: Are cows more valuable than human beings in Nigeria? This question becomes even more unsettling when viewed through the lens of recurring, unprovoked attacks by armed herdsmen—mostly identified as Fulani militants—on rural communities. Headlines consistently portray the devastating impact of these attacks: “At least 21 killed in Nigeria after herdsmen attack villagers,” “At least 140 villagers killed by suspected herders,” and “On April 12, 2022, armed herdsmen attacked several villages in Benue State, killing over 25 people and injuring many more.” Th...

Security Chiefs, Do Your Job—Nigerians Are Dying: The Herders-Farmers Conflict Rooted in Land, Law, and Neglect

 Security Chiefs, Do Your Job—Nigerians Are Dying: The Herders-Farmers Conflict Rooted in Land, Law, and Neglect By Daniel Okonkwo For close to three decades, a brutal and persistent conflict has gripped Nigeria’s Middle Belt, with the state of Benue emerging as one of its bloodiest epicenters. What began as tensions between itinerant herders and local farmers has evolved into an entrenched humanitarian and security crisis. Despite Nigeria’s constitutional guarantees and land governance framework, the conflict continues to claim lives, displace communities, and erode the nation’s socio-political cohesion.  Why can't herders—like every other Nigerian—buy land or peacefully negotiate for grazing rights with host communities? Instead, there have been recurring reports of herders trespassing on farmland, destroying crops, and engaging in deadly confrontations with local populations. This crisis intensified during the previous administration and has escalated dramatically in recent...