Skip to main content

 Congo’s Executions Sparks Global Concern

By Daniel Okonkwo for Profile International Human Rights Advocate


The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has drawn international attention and condemnation following the execution of 102 prisoners, with 70 more reportedly awaiting the same fate. The government claims these actions are part of a crackdown on urban crime and insecurity.


According to a statement released Sunday by the Minister of Justice, Constant Mutamba, the prisoners—young men aged 18 to 35—were identified as armed robbers and "urban bandits" known locally as Kulunas. These individuals were executed at Angenga prison in northwest Congo. The government confirmed that 45 men were killed in late December 2024.


Mutamba also disclosed that a third group of prisoners, recently flown in from the capital, Kinshasa, would soon face execution, further escalating concerns about the administration’s handling of justice and human rights.


The executions have ignited polarizing debates within the country. While some Congolese citizens have expressed relief, seeing the move as a necessary step toward restoring public safety, others have raised alarms over potential judicial abuses and the broader implications for human rights.


Fiston Kakule, a resident of Goma in eastern Congo, voiced support for the government’s decision. “We welcome this decision by the minister because it will help put an end to urban crime. From 8 p.m. onwards, you can’t move around freely because you’re afraid of running into a Kuluna,” he said.


However, human rights advocate Espoir Muhinuka warned of the dangers of extrajudicial killings and miscarriages of justice. “The fight against urban gangs must go hand in hand with efforts to combat poverty, unemployment, and social exclusion, which are often contributing factors to crime,” Muhinuka stated, emphasizing the need for judicial processes to strictly adhere to due process and fundamental guarantees.


The use of the death penalty in Congo has been fraught with controversy. Although abolished in 1981, it was reinstated in 2006. Despite this, Congo had not carried out an execution since 2003 until a March 2024 announcement signaled the resumption of capital punishment. The measure was initially intended to apply exclusively to military personnel accused of treason.


Eight soldiers were sentenced to death in May 2024 for deserting the battlefield, and another 25 were convicted in July for similar offenses. However, none of these sentences are known to have been carried out, highlighting the abrupt and selective implementation of capital punishment for civilian offenders.


Critics argue that the root causes of urban crime—poverty, unemployment, and lack of social opportunities—must be addressed in tandem with judicial measures. They warn that the recent executions could set a dangerous precedent, potentially leading to arbitrary convictions under political pressure.


The Congolese government has so far refrained from commenting on the legal status of the latest group of prisoners transferred to Angenga prison. International human rights organizations are closely monitoring the situation, with calls for transparency and accountability growing louder.


The resumption of executions in Congo could have far-reaching consequences for the country’s international standing. As global institutions push for the abolition of the death penalty, Congo’s actions may lead to strained relations with its international partners and heighten scrutiny of its human rights record.


The unfolding situation shows the complexity of balancing public safety with the fundamental rights of individuals. While the fight against urban gangs is crucial, the methods employed by the Congolese government will negatively and undoubtedly shape the narrative of justice and governance in the years to come.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

 THE ILLEGAL AND HEALTH RISKS OF CONSUMING CROCODILE MEAT IN NIGERIA: I thought you should know Eating suya is considered the ultimate African street food, particularly popular in countries like Nigeria. However, in recent times, some individuals have strayed from the norm, venturing into consuming endangered animals—a dangerous practice that can have serious legal consequences. In Nigeria, the consumption of grilled crocodile meat—or crocodile meat in any form—can land you in jail. Yes, you heard that correctly. The Nigerian government has sued individuals for killing and consuming crocodiles, citing violations of environmental and wildlife protection laws. In cities like Abuja and Lagos, there are numerous joints where crocodile meat is openly sold, often without the knowledge of customers regarding the dangers and legal risks involved. If you are caught buying or eating such meat by government enforcement agents, you could face arrest and prosecution. Importantly, ignorance of t...
 ARE COWS MORE VALUABLE THAN HUMANS IN NIGERIA? WHAT IS THE VALUE OF LIFE IN A NATION IN CRISIS — HOW MANY MORE MUST DIE? By Daniel Okonkwo In recent years, the value of human life in Nigeria has come under intense scrutiny, particularly due to the relentless attacks on farming communities, primarily in the Middle Belt and North-Central regions. The haunting question that continues to echo across local and international discourse is: Are cows more valuable than human beings in Nigeria? This question becomes even more unsettling when viewed through the lens of recurring, unprovoked attacks by armed herdsmen—mostly identified as Fulani militants—on rural communities. Headlines consistently portray the devastating impact of these attacks: “At least 21 killed in Nigeria after herdsmen attack villagers,” “At least 140 villagers killed by suspected herders,” and “On April 12, 2022, armed herdsmen attacked several villages in Benue State, killing over 25 people and injuring many more.” Th...

Security Chiefs, Do Your Job—Nigerians Are Dying: The Herders-Farmers Conflict Rooted in Land, Law, and Neglect

 Security Chiefs, Do Your Job—Nigerians Are Dying: The Herders-Farmers Conflict Rooted in Land, Law, and Neglect By Daniel Okonkwo For close to three decades, a brutal and persistent conflict has gripped Nigeria’s Middle Belt, with the state of Benue emerging as one of its bloodiest epicenters. What began as tensions between itinerant herders and local farmers has evolved into an entrenched humanitarian and security crisis. Despite Nigeria’s constitutional guarantees and land governance framework, the conflict continues to claim lives, displace communities, and erode the nation’s socio-political cohesion.  Why can't herders—like every other Nigerian—buy land or peacefully negotiate for grazing rights with host communities? Instead, there have been recurring reports of herders trespassing on farmland, destroying crops, and engaging in deadly confrontations with local populations. This crisis intensified during the previous administration and has escalated dramatically in recent...